Malala Anthology

Jan 22, 2013

Knott Politics

I don't believe in censorship, but censure is sometimes called for. In this case, it's a piece of pseudo-political dreck by Michael Robbins, who—in a poem tantalizingly entitled "To the Drone Vaguely Realizing Eastward"—attempts to avenge the 200-plus children so far killed by drone strikes. Here's the first verse:
This is a poem for President Drone.
It was written by a camel.
Can I borrow your phone?
This is for President Mark Hamill.
Maybe one has to be drunk on Sterno to write this way, or maybe all it takes is a PhD from the University of Chicago. In any case, readers who enjoy bashing their own skulls with a tire iron may enjoy the rest of Robbins' ersatz poem here.

If, on the other hand, you prefer (a) real poetry and (b) real politics, let me suggest a real poet: Bill Knott—the fellow I believe Robbins is ham-handedly trying to imitate (in tone if not in form). Take, for example:
Testament

You know the fable
How a soldier’s bible
Kept in his jacket pocket
Stopped a bullet

But that catechism
Born to foster schism
Also stopped his heart his
Mind from finding peace

He would not have had need
Of such a shield
Nor would his blood have been
Thrilled to kill someone

Of another faith
If in that book he had not first read death
Or Knott's poem about Robert S. McNamara:
Secretary

The technocrat gloats
at his remote desk
but just to show
he's still human

he still does a few
chores by hand
and adds a human
touch for example

rather than having
his computers do it
he himself stamps

all by himself
stamps PAID on
the casualty-lists.
And, inimitably (take that, Ez!):
Penny Wise

well alright
I grant you
he was a fascist
ahem antisemitism the
er war and all
I'm not defending them
but at least
you've got to admit
at least he
made the quatrains run on time
These I got from Knott's Selected Political Poems, 1965-2005, which is (I believe) out of print. More's the pity!

10 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joe, I appreciate your kind words about my "political" poems,

    but I think you're being too harsh on the Robbins effort . . . no, it is not one of
    his best, but it was occasioned/commissioned and is indeed a 'deadline' poem,
    and has to be read with those conditions and qualifications in mind . . . given
    those limitations, I think what he wrote is as good as anyone else could have
    in those circumstances (I haven't read the ones by the other poets invited
    to participate)—and

    he has to be given credit for undertaking the challenge—I certainly couldn't
    have done any better than he, in fact my inaugdoggeral would have been
    much worse!

    He is an immensely talented and intelligent and bold poet, and if this poem
    is a failure (and I would prefer to delay judgement on it), so what . . .

    ReplyDelete
  3. and he deserves praise for the adversarial content of his poem—

    did any of the other commissioned poems even reference the starwars drones used by the Obama administration?—











    ReplyDelete
  4. It's certainly not the stance I object to, Bill. (The subject deserves trenchant treatment.) It's the content, such as it is. But it may just be that I'm out of the pop-cult loop enough to miss the relevance of Mark Hamill, a camel, an Ernie, and a bomb bay door in the context of drone strikes. I continue to think Robbins must have been drunk or otherwise altered when he wrote it. Like all the work of his that I'm aware of (see here, here, here, etc.), it is stand-up comedy of the clever sneer variety but after a few lines grows very tiresome to read. The different between your work and his is the difference between George Carlin and Andrew Dice Clay. In my humble opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Joseph, Thank you for being one of the few dissenting opinions on this poem. It blew my mind to see so many residents of the internet praising it, some even going so far as to call it "brilliant". In fact, I wrote my own blog post about this poem that you can read here. Let's just say when Michael read it he did not agree with what I had to say. Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Do I call you Ted, Hash, or Berryman? I'll go with Ted. I read your send-up of Robbins and got a big kick out of it. Keep after it!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Robbins doesn't need me to defend his work, but I'll just reiterate that I think

    he is a massively talented writer, and anything he publishes is worth

    reading, even this deadline occasional verse—

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bill, I wish you'd do one of your close readings on a Robbins poem. His most famous piece (the one with the lines "you shouldn’t drink diarrhea / unless you bring enough for everybody") might be a place to start. It's easy to praise to condemn any writer without specifics. I happen to think that Robbins' specifics provide rope enough to hang him, but I one of your intelligent readings might help us all appreciate what he's up to.

    ReplyDelete
  9. here is something re: Bill's "stuff" :

    http://www.pw.org/content/thomas_lux_searches_for_the_elusive_bill_knott

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks, Ed. Good to see Thomas Lux out there stumping for Bill's Selected....

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...